Posts

SEC Charges optionsXpress in Naked Short Selling Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an online brokerage and clearing agency specializing in options and futures as well as four officials at the firm and a customer involved in an abusive naked short selling scheme.

The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges that Chicago-based optionsXpress Inc. failed to satisfy its close-out obligations under Regulation SHO by repeatedly engaging in a series of sham “reset” transactions designed to give the illusion that the firm had purchased securities of like kind and quantity. The firm and customer Jonathan I. Feldman engaged in these sham reset transactions in a number of securities, resulting in continuous failures to deliver. Regulation SHO requires the delivery of equity securities to a registered clearing agency when delivery is due, generally three days after the trade date (T+3). If no delivery is made by that time, the firm must purchase or borrow the securities to close out the failure-to-deliver position by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the next day (T+4).

The former chief financial officer at optionsXpress, Thomas E. Stern of Chicago, was named in the SEC’s administrative proceeding along with optionsXpress and Feldman. Three other optionsXpress officials – head of trading and customer service Peter J. Bottini and compliance officers Phillip J. Hoeh and Kevin E. Strine – were named in a separate administrative proceeding and settled the charges against them for their roles in the scheme.

According to the SEC’s order, the misconduct occurred from at least October 2008 to March 2010. In September 2011, optionsXpress became a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation.

The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that the sham reset transactions impacted the market for the issuers. For example, from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 31, 2010, optionsXpress customers including Feldman accounted for an average of 47.9 percent of the daily trading volume in one of the securities. In 2009 alone, the optionsXpress customer accounts engaging in the activity purchased approximately $5.7 billion worth of securities and sold short approximately $4 billion of options. In 2009, Feldman himself purchased at least $2.9 billion of securities and sold short at least $1.7 billion of options through his account at optionsXpress.

According to the SEC’s order, by engaging in the alleged misconduct, optionsXpress violated Rules 204 and 204T of Regulation SHO; Feldman willfully violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-21 thereunder; optionsXpress and Stern caused and willfully aided and abetted Feldman’s violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-21 thereunder; and Stern caused and willfully aided and abetted optionsXpress’ violations of Rules 204 and 204T.

In the separate settled administrative proceeding, Bottini, Hoeh, and Strine consented to a cease-and-desist order finding that they caused optionsXpress’ violations of Rules 204 and 204T of Regulation SHO and ordering them to cease-and-desist from committing or causing violations of Rules 204. They neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings. (Rel. 34-66814; File No. 3-14848 and 33-9313; File No. 3-14848)

Securities Litigation and FINRA Arbitration

Contact Fort Lauderdale securities litigation attorney Howard N. Kahn, Esq. if you or someone you know has a securities dispute. In addition to being an experienced securities litigation attorney, Mr. Kahn also serves as a FINRA arbitrator for individual investors, brokers, and brokerage firms. You can reach him at 954-321-0176 or online.

Schwab Reviews Risky Exchange-Traded Products

Discount brokerage Charles Schwab is reviewing whether to add a warning when a customer is about to trade certain exchange-traded products, according to a Reuters story titled “Schwab considers warnings on controversial exchange-traded products.” Schwab’s position indicates the need for retail investors to be cautious when considering an investment in “esoteric” securities.

According to the Reuters report:

“The move follows the sudden plunge in an exchange-traded note called VelocityShares Daily 2X VIX Short-Term ETN, or TVIX, which lost 60 percent of its value last week.

‘It is under review, primarily because of the risk we saw in things like the TVIX. No one knew that those kind of things were going to happen,’ said Randy Frederick, managing director of trading and derivatives at the Schwab Center for Financial Research in Austin, Texas.

The warning would be similar to one that pops up when investors trade options related to volatility, which are more complex than stocks.”

Contact Fort Lauderdale securities litigation attorney Howard N. Kahn, Esq. if you or someone you know has a securities dispute. In addition to being an experienced securities litigation attorney, Mr. Kahn also serves as a FINRA arbitrator for individual investors, brokers, and brokerage firms. You can reach him at 954-321-0176 or online.

FINRA Charges Charles Schwab with Rule Violations

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) accused Charles Schwab Corporation of limiting customers legal rights in a complaint filed on February 1, 2012.

FINRA’s complaint alleges that Charles Schwab & Company violates FINRA rules by requiring its customers to waive their rights to bring class action lawsuits against the firm.

Schwab reportedly modified its customer account agreement in October, 2011, to include a provision requiring customers to waive their rights to bring or participate in class action lawsuits where Schwab is named as a defendant.

Almost 7 million Schwab customers received the amended agreements.

According to a FINRA news release:

“The agreement also included a provision requiring customers to agree that arbitrators in arbitration proceedings would not have the authority to consolidate more than one party’s claims. FINRA’s complaint charges that both provisions violate FINRA rules concerning language or conditions that firms may place in customer agreements.

FINRA’s complaint seeks an expedited hearing because Schwab’s conduct is ongoing, as the firm has continued to use account agreements containing these provisions in opening more than 50,000 new customer accounts since October 2011.”

If you are an active stock market investor and have a Schwab account, this provision may apply to you. Contact Fort Lauderdale securities attorney Howard Kahn, Esq. at 954-321-0176 or via email to discuss your case.

Click here to read a copy of FINRA’s complaint against Charles Schwab.